Would you read Star Magazine?

I was recently looking at a Star magazine. One thing that I discovered is that the writers who create that magazine uses the perfect rhetoric to grab people's attention. Yes, its true that most of the stuff in the magazine is false and not true, but the magazine can still draw you in. One thing that Magazines like Star ad Enquirer are good at is taking pictures and making up a story to go along with that picture. If they take a picture of Britney Spears crying, they can make anything up from she got in a fight with her mom to she almost died in a car crash. One reason why we are so drawn into the magazine sometimes is because they use pictures. You can never be too sure of what people say these days, but one thing that is hard to argue is a physical image of what happened. I believe that sight is one of the most powerful things that are the hardest to argue because it has a lot of logic behind it. They use that to their advantage. The only problem is, is that they back the pictures up with false facts. You are soon aware of this when you begin reading all the other magazines with similar stories to each other.

Speedos illegal?

I was just reading in the news today about how a guy got a ticket for wearing a speedo. Down on a beach in Florida, this guy was laying out when a deputy came up to him and told him that he had indecent exposure. The deputy continued by kicking him off the beach and giving him a ticket. For a speedo....

So who gets the say on what kind of outfits are too risky to wear in public? After reading this story, i found another one in which a girl was arrested from her senior prom for wearing too skimpy of a prom dress. I would have a agree that it was a little to risky since it practically looked like a 2 piece swim suit. But who gets to draw the line as to what is too much indecent exposure and what isn't?

After the guy with the speedo brought the situation to the court house, they immediately dismissed it, but the guy is suing for what happened.... he should!